Roles of Artificial Intelligence in Collaboration with Humans: Automation, Augmentation, and the Future of Work
Management Science · 2026 · Andreas Fügener、Dominik D. Walzner、Alok Gupta
中文摘要
随着与人工智能 (AI) 的协作日益普遍,人类的工作前景将发生重大变化。本文探讨了在判断任务情境中,人工智能在替代人类 (自动化) 以及与人类协作 (增强) 两种情形下所带来的收益。通过一个分析建模框架,我们表明将人工智能用于自动化或增强的最优选择取决于不同类型的人机互补性。我们的分析表明,任务间互补性水平越高,自动化的使用越多;相反,任务内互补性水平越高,增强的使用越多。我们将自动化与增强两种角色整合进任务分配框架,其中人工智能与人类共同处理一组判断任务,以在给定可用人力资源水平的条件下优化绩效。我们通过一项基于实验数据的实证研究验证该框架,实验中人类在有人工智能支持和没有人工智能支持两种条件下对图像进行分类。当任务间互补性与任务内互补性同时存在时,最优工作配置呈现出一致的工作分配模式:人工智能自动化相对简单的任务,在人类与人工智能表现相近的任务上对人类进行增强,而人类则在相对困难的任务上独立完成工作。我们的工作对理论与实践均有若干贡献。关于互补性效应的研究结果为自动化与增强的收益提供了细致入微的视角。我们的任务分配框架凸显了面向未来工作的潜在工作设计,尤其是考虑了人力资源再配置这一常被忽视、但对提升组织绩效至关重要的角色。本文由 D. J. Wu 接收,发表于"人-算法连接"专刊。补充材料:在线附录与数据文件可从 https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2024.05684 获取。
Abstract
Humans will see significant changes in the future of work as collaboration with artificial intelligence (AI) will become commonplace. This work explores the benefits of AI in the setting of judgment tasks when it replaces humans (automation) and when it works with humans (augmentation). Through an analytical modeling framework, we show that the optimal use of AI for automation or augmentation depends on different types of human-AI complementarity. Our analysis demonstrates that the use of automation increases with higher levels of between-task complementarity. In contrast, the use of augmentation increases with higher levels of within-task complementarity. We integrate both automation and augmentation roles into our task allocation framework, where an AI and humans work on a set of judgment tasks to optimize performance with a given level of available human resources. We validate our framework with an empirical study based on experimental data in which humans classify images with and without AI support. When between-task complementarity and within-task complementarity exist, we see a consistent distribution of work pattern for optimal work configurations; AI automates relatively easy tasks, AI augments humans on tasks with similar human and AI performance, and humans work without AI on relatively difficult tasks. Our work provides several contributions to theory and practice. The findings on the effects of complementarity provide a nuanced view regarding the benefits of automation and augmentation. Our task allocation framework highlights potential job designs for the future of work, especially by considering the often-ignored, critical role of human resource reallocation in improving organizational performance. This paper was accepted by D. J. Wu, Special Issue on the Human-Algorithm Connection. Supplemental Material: The online appendix and data files are available at https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2024.05684 .