Management Science · 2026 · Şule Alan、Gozde Çörekçioğlu、Mustafa Kaba、Matthias Sutter
中文摘要
我们使用土耳其 24 家大型企业中 2,000 多名专业人士的数据,探讨女性领导力与职场关系文化之间的关系。首先,我们发现,尽管男性与女性领导者的认知能力相当,但他们在社会情感特征上存在差异。其次,我们表明,男性领导与女性领导下的职场关系动态有所不同。在男性领导下,男性员工形成同质性的职业联系;而在女性领导下,我们观察到性别隔离程度较低的关系网络,男性和女性都与女性同事建立更多联系。在女性领导下,女性员工从领导者那里获得更多支持,也更不可能离职。然而,在女性领导者手下工作的女性员工报告的工作满意度和任人唯贤程度更低。深入探究机制后发现,在缺乏女性领导者社会支持的情况下,女性员工对职场氛围的评价更为悲观。总体而言,我们的研究结果凸显了来自领导者的社会支持所发挥的重要作用,并表明在领导职位上增加给予支持的女性存在,可能是培育更具包容性的职场关系文化的有效途径。本文由行为经济学与决策分析领域编辑 Marie-Claire Villeval 接收。基金资助:本研究得到马克斯·普朗克集体物品研究所和德国科学基金会(Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft)在德国卓越战略下的资助 [Grant EXC 2126/1–390838866]。补充材料:在线附录与数据文件可在 https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2024.05507 获取。
Abstract
Using data from over 2,000 professionals in 24 large corporations in Türkiye, we explore the relationship between female leadership and the relational culture in the workplace. First, we document that although male and female leaders possess equal cognitive capacity, they diverge in socioemotional characteristics. Next, we show that the relational dynamics in the workplace are different under male and female leadership. Male employees form homophilic professional ties under male leadership, whereas we observe less gender-segregated networks under female leadership, where both males and females establish more links with their female colleagues. Female employees receive more support from their leaders and are less likely to quit under female leadership. However, female employees working under female leaders report worse workplace satisfaction and meritocracy. Delving into the mechanisms reveals that female employees depict a gloomier workplace climate in the absence of social support from their female leader. Overall, our findings highlight the influential role of social support from leaders and suggest that increasing supportive female presence in leadership positions may be an effective way to foster a more inclusive relational culture in the workplace. This paper was accepted by Marie-Claire Villeval, behavioral economics and decision analysis. Funding: This work was supported by the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods and Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Science Foundation) under Germany’s Excellence Strategy [Grant EXC 2126/1–390838866]. Supplemental Material: The online appendix and data files are available at https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2024.05507 .