Management Science · 2026 · Ben Lourie、Devin M. Shanthikumar、Terry Shevlin、Chenqi Zhu
中文摘要
我们利用近200万人的详细交易数据,并围绕月度儿童税收抵免(CTC)支付进行双重差分分析,考察2021年儿童税收抵免扩张的影响。我们发现,与支付前一周相比,受助者在支付后一周的消费显著增加,且对低收入受助者和子女较多的受助者效果更为明显。我们还发现,低收入受助者的流动性约束显著缓解,透支、使用高息发薪日贷款以及通过零工工作获取补充收入均有所减少。在这些初步发现的基础上,我们的分析进一步深入到更为细致、更具政策针对性的方面:我们发现,与年度退税相比,月度儿童税收抵免支付对流动性约束的缓解作用更大。此外,月度支付降低了消费波动性并提高了消费水平的稳定性。这些结果可为关于支付频率的考量提供参考。进一步地,我们通过识别消费效应在最低收入受助者中最为明显——这些受助者在该方案下享有全额可退还的待遇——并指出较高收入受助者的消费未出现显著变化,从而为该政策逐步纳入和逐步退出区间的收入阈值提供了洞见。我们的结果提供了关于2021年儿童税收抵免修正案所致影响的首个大规模、基于交易的实证档案证据,并为政策相关讨论提供了洞见。本文由会计学领域编辑Eric So接受。资助:我们感谢Think Forward Initiative、加利福尼亚大学欧文分校以及加利福尼亚大学欧文分校的U See I Write计划为本手稿写作所提供的集中写作营资助。补充材料:数据文件可在 https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2023.02254 获取。
Abstract
We analyze the impact of the 2021 Child Tax Credit (CTC) expansion using detailed transaction data from nearly two million individuals and difference-in-difference analyses around monthly CTC payments. We find that recipients significantly increase their consumption in the week following the payment versus the prior week, with more pronounced effects for lower-income recipients and those with more children. We also find a significant reduction in liquidity constraints for lower-income recipients, with reductions in overdrafts, use of high-interest payday loans, and use of gig work for supplemental income. Building on these initial findings, our analysis further delves into more nuanced, policy-targeted aspects: We observe a greater alleviation of liquidity constraints from monthly CTC payments compared with annual tax refunds. In addition, monthly payments decrease consumption volatility and increase stability in consumption levels. These results inform considerations for payment frequency. Furthermore, we provide insights into the income thresholds for the policy’s phase-in and phase-out ranges by identifying the most pronounced consumption effects among the lowest-income recipients—who benefit from full refundability under the plan—and noting an absence of significant consumption changes among higher-income recipients. Our results present the first large-scale, transaction-based, empirical archival evidence of the effects stemming from the 2021 CTC amendments and provide insights for policy-related discussions. This paper was accepted by Eric So, accounting. Funding: We acknowledge funding from the Think Forward Initiative and the University of California, Irvine, and the U See I Write initiative at the University of California, Irvine, for focused writing retreats which facilitated the writing of this manuscript. Supplemental Material: The data files are available at https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2023.02254 .