微观边际消费倾向与宏观反事实:2008年退税的案例
Micro MPCs and Macro Counterfactuals: The Case of the 2008 Rebates
Quarterly Journal of Economics · 2025 · [{"name": "Jacob Orchard", "affiliation": ["Federal Reserve", "Federal Reserve Board of Governors"]}, {"name": "Valerie Ramey", "affiliation": ["Stanford University"]}, {"name": "Johannes Wieland", "affiliation": ["Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco", "University of California System"]}]
中文摘要
摘要:我们提出证据表明,主要家庭研究估计得到的高边际消费倾向(MPC)会导致不可信的宏观经济反事实。以2008年退税为案例研究,我们利用估计得到的微观MPC校准一个标准宏观模型,以构建没有退税情况下的反事实宏观消费路径。这些反事实路径意味着,消费支出本会在2008年春季和夏季暴跌,并在2008年9月基本恢复。我们利用叙事材料和预测论证这些路径并不可信。我们表明,标准的双向固定效应对微观MPC的估计存在向上偏误。在校正这些偏误后,我们利用CEX数据估计得到的微观MPC小于以往文献。我们表明,对模型进行现实性的修改会产生一般均衡力量,这种力量会抑制而非放大微观MPC。较小的微观MPC与起抑制作用的一般均衡力量相结合,意味着一般均衡消费乘数低于0.2。
Abstract
ABSTRACT We present evidence that the high estimated marginal propensities to consume (MPCs) from the leading household studies result in implausible macroeconomic counterfactuals. Using the 2008 tax rebate as a case study, we calibrate a standard macro model with the estimated micro MPCs to construct counterfactual macroeconomic consumption paths in the absence of a rebate. The counterfactual paths imply that consumption expenditures would have plummeted in spring and summer 2008 and mostly recovered in September 2008. We use narratives and forecasts to argue that these paths are implausible. We show that standard two-way fixed effect estimates of the micro MPCs are upward biased. When we correct for the biases, we estimate smaller micro MPCs using the CEX data than the previous literature. We show that realistic modifications of the model result in general equilibrium forces that dampen rather than amplify micro MPCs. The combination of smaller micro MPCs and dampening general equilibrium forces implies general equilibrium consumption multipliers that are below 0.2.
📖 精读解析
本文已有三模型交叉精读卡片, 登录后可在站内查看结构化解读与关键图表。
在 ireadpaper 查看全部 →