Management Science · 2026 · Qi Feng、J. George Shanthikumar、Mengying Xue
中文摘要
选择模型刻画消费者在给定选择集上对各选项的选择概率,在众多领域得到广泛研究和应用。我们提出一种选择的时序树表示,它涵盖所有理性选择模型。与现有的结构性选择模型相比,树表示具有应对模型识别关键挑战的两大优势。第一,所有理性选择模型都存在树表示,且树表示的一个子类(具有集合依赖分支)与理性选择模型一一对应。这弥补了现有结构性模型刻画中存在的缺口:这些刻画或者不可识别,或者施加了无法解释的条件,或者未能覆盖理性选择模型的整个空间。第二,树表示允许基于现有知识和数据系统地设定选择模型结构,具有灵活性。特别地,设定一个树表示所需的参数数量可主要由充分知识水平决定,该水平对应于树分支的特定层级。充分知识水平可根据可用数据量实证确定,而这又决定了模型估计所需的参数数量。因此,树表示为数据整合提供了一种自然的方式,避免了由限制性假设导致的模型误设以及一般模型的过拟合。
Abstract
Choice models, which specify the consumers’ choice probabilities of options over a given choice set, are widely studied and applied in many fields. We propose a temporal tree representation of choice that covers all rational choice models. Compared with existing structural choice models, the tree representation exhibits two major advantages that address the key challenges of model identification. First, all rational choice models have a tree representation, and a subclass of tree representation (with set-dependent branching) has a one-to-one correspondence with the rational choice models. This bridges the gap in the existing characterizations of structural models, which are unidentifiable, impose uninterpretable conditions, or do not cover the entire space of rational choice models. Second, the tree representation allows for the flexibility of systematically specifying the choice model structure based on available knowledge and data. In particular, the number of parameters needed to specify a tree representation can be primarily determined by the sufficient knowledge level, which corresponds to a specific layer of the tree branching. The sufficient knowledge level can be empirically determined based on the amount of available data, which, in turn, determines the number of parameters needed for model estimation. Therefore, the tree representation allows for a natural way of data integration, avoiding misspecification from restrictive assumptions and overfitting for general models.