Management Science · 2026 · Timothy C.Y. Chan、Ningyuan Chen、Craig Fernandes
中文摘要
“超级明星”市场——即一小部分个体获得不成比例的高收入的市场——在创业、体育和娱乐等领域十分常见。这类市场的参与者面临显著的收入不确定性,这可能抑制其进入或促使其提前退出。为应对这一难题,我们提出收入池:即个体同意在达到特定薪酬里程碑时,与池成员分享一部分未来收入的合同。迄今为止,实践中已签署数百份收入池合同。本文构建了首个分析此类合同的数学模型,重点关注稳定性(即没有代理人退出或加入的池)。当限于创建单一池时,我们证明始终存在一个具有特定结构性质的稳定池。一般而言,较强的代理人往往更“乐于合作”,偏好较大的池,而较弱的代理人则更“自私”,偏好较小的池。接下来,我们分析遵循最大规模限制的池(与当前实践相仿),并证明稳定性依然成立。这类池通常需要比强代理人更多的弱代理人,并且我们发现了一个有趣的“帕累托占优”结果,即稳定池中的所有代理人都偏好某一个特定的唯一稳定池。最后,我们研究一般划分结构,证明在一定条件下稳定划分始终存在,并提供构造此类划分的算法。我们以一项基于2000名职业棒球运动员数据的案例研究作结,表明在不同合同参数下,若球员加入收入池,社会福利将提高20%–30%。
Abstract
“Superstar” markets, where a small portion of individuals earn disproportionately high incomes, are common in fields like entrepreneurship, sports, and entertainment. Participants in these markets face significant income uncertainty, which can deter entry or prompt early exit. To address this difficulty, we propose income pools: contracts where individuals agree to share a portion of future earnings with pool members if a specific salary milestone is achieved. To date, hundreds of income pool contracts have been signed in practice. This paper develops the first mathematical model to analyze such contracts, focusing on stability (i.e., pools where no agents leave or join). When constrained to creating a single pool, we show that a stable pool always exists with specific structural properties. Generally, stronger agents tend to be more “collaborative” and favor larger pools, whereas weaker agents are more “selfish” and prefer smaller pools. Next, we analyze pools that adhere to a maximum size (mirroring current practice) and show that stability persists. These pools typically require more weaker agents than strong ones and we find an interesting “Pareto dominance” result, whereby all agents in a stable pool prefer a particular unique stable pool. Finally, we study general partition structures, prove that a stable partition always exists under certain conditions, and provide an algorithm to construct such a partition. We conclude with a case study on data from 2,000 professional baseball players to demonstrate a 20%–30% increase in social welfare if players join income pools, under varying contract parameters.