Games and Economic Behavior · 2026 · Martijn W. Ketelaars、Peter Borm、P. Jean-Jacques Herings
中文摘要
本文引入金融网络中的对偶性概念,其核心是损失与收益的分摊。在破产问题中,破产实体将其非负资产在一组债权人之间进行分配,对偶性已被充分理解。金融网络通过允许多个拥有各自资产且经由相互债权相互关联的行为主体,对破产问题进行了推广。我们认为,要恰当地表述金融网络的对偶性,允许负资产是必不可少的。我们证明,金融网络中基于债权规则的转移方案与对偶金融网络中基于这些债权规则之对偶规则的转移方案之间存在线性关系。此外,对偶金融网络使我们能够定义对偶转移规则与对偶分配规则。我们证明,自对偶转移规则和自对偶分配规则都必须基于自对偶债权规则。另一方面,我们表明,基于自对偶债权规则的转移规则未必是自对偶的,而基于自对偶债权规则的分配规则则总是自对偶的。
Abstract
This article introduces the concept of duality in financial networks, which entails the division of losses versus gains. In bankruptcy problems, in which a bankrupt entity divides its non-negative assets among a group of claimants, duality is well understood. Financial networks generalize bankruptcy problems by allowing for multiple agents with individual assets interconnected by mutual claims. We argue that allowing for negative assets is imperative to adequately formulate duality for financial networks. We show that there is a linear relationship between transfer schemes based on claims rules in a financial network and transfer schemes based on the dual of those claims rules in the dual financial network. Moreover, dual financial networks enable us to define dual transfer rules and dual allocation rules. We show that both self-dual transfer rules and self-dual allocation rules have to be based on self-dual claims rules. On the other hand, we demonstrate that transfer rules based on self-dual claims rules need not be self-dual, whereas allocation rules based on self-dual claims rules are always self-dual.