Econometrica · 2026 · Jonathan I. Dingel、Felix Tintelnot
中文摘要
本文考察定量空间模型在日益增多的精细空间数据中的应用,这些数据被用于研究地方经济结果。在人们从大量潜在居住地—工作地组合中进行选择的细粒度情境中,观测到的结果部分反映了个体特异的选择。通过解析例子、蒙特卡洛模拟以及街区就业繁荣的事件研究,我们证明,使观测份额与模型概率相等的校准程序在这些高维情境中表现非常糟糕。对空间联系的简约设定则能提供更好的反事实预测。为量化个体决策中的特异成分所引致的反事实结果不确定性,我们引入一个包含有限数量个体的定量空间模型。将该模型应用于亚马逊拟议设在纽约市的第二总部,结果显示,对于大多数街区,其预测效应在不同个体特异性实现之间差异很大。
Abstract
We examine the application of quantitative spatial models to the growing body of fine spatial data used to study local economic outcomes. In granular settings in which people choose from a large set of potential residence‐workplace pairs, observed outcomes in part reflect idiosyncratic choices. Using analytical examples, Monte Carlo simulations, and event studies of neighborhood employment booms, we demonstrate that calibration procedures that equate observed shares and modeled probabilities perform very poorly in these high‐dimensional settings. Parsimonious specifications of spatial linkages deliver better counterfactual predictions. To quantify the uncertainty about counterfactual outcomes induced by the idiosyncratic component of individuals' decisions, we introduce a quantitative spatial model with a finite number of individuals. Applying this model to Amazon's proposed second headquarters in New York City reveals that its predicted consequences for most neighborhoods vary substantially across realizations of the individual idiosyncrasies.