Journal of Public Economics · 2026 · Anne Ardila Brenøe、Ursa Krenk、Andreas Steinhauer、Josef Zweimüller
中文摘要
当女性员工因生育而暂时休假时,企业会如何调整其劳动需求?利用奥地利行政数据,我们将发生生育事件的企业与未发生生育事件的企业进行比较,并利用显著改变了休假时长的政策改革。我们得到三个主要结果。第一,企业主要通过预期性雇用来应对,而中期内对总就业和工资总额的影响较小。第二,这些调整在性别上存在显著差异:预期性替代性雇用绝大多数为女性,但在中期内企业员工构成向男性倾斜,其驱动因素是女性新雇员的任职时间较短以及男性在职员工的留任率较高。第三,尽管更长的休假权利显著延长了实际休假缺勤时间,但我们并未发现企业在不同休假制度下的劳动需求反应存在系统性差异。综合来看,这些发现表明,企业主要通过预期性雇用和员工构成的性别变化来适应育儿假,即使在休假时长差异显著的情况下,总劳动需求的中期变化也十分有限。
Abstract
How do firms adjust their labor demand when a female employee takes temporary leave after childbirth? Using Austrian administrative data, we compare firms with and without a birth event and exploit policy reforms that significantly altered leave durations. We find three main results. First, firms respond primarily through anticipatory hiring, while medium-run effects on total employment and the wage bill are small. Second, these adjustments differ sharply by gender: anticipatory replacement hiring is overwhelmingly female, but firms’ workforce composition shifts toward men in the medium run, driven by the shorter tenure of female new hires and higher retention of male incumbents. Third, while longer leave entitlements substantially extend actual leave absences, we do not find systematic differences in firms’ labor demand responses across leave regimes. Taken together, these findings show that firms accommodate parental leave mainly through anticipatory hiring and gendered changes in workforce composition, with limited medium-run changes in aggregate labor demand even when leave durations differ substantially.