Quarterly Journal of Economics · 2026 · [{"name": "Samuel Dodini", "affiliation": ["Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas"]}, {"name": "Anna Stansbury", "affiliation": []}, {"name": "Alexander Willén", "affiliation": ["Norwegian School of Economics"]}]
中文摘要
摘要 如果工会提高工人工资,谁来买单?我们利用挪威工会会费税前可扣除性(税收抵扣资格)的变化,作为企业层面工会密度的准外生变异来源,对企业应对工会化程度上升的反应进行了全面评估。在平均意义上的私营部门企业中,工会密度上升提高了劳动力成本,导致企业收缩就业与生产,在不提高劳动份额的情况下降低利润。成本归宿由多方分担:消费者通过更高价格承担部分成本,股东通过更低利润承担部分成本,其余部分由生产率提升抵消。工资总额下降,损失集中于依附程度较低的“外部人”(outsider)工人。企业反应随市场竞争程度呈现系统性差异。在制造业中,企业所处的产品市场与劳动力市场竞争程度较低,其反应发生逆转:平均意义上的企业扩大就业与生产,降低劳动力买方压价(labor markdowns),且利润未出现下降。相反,更高的劳动力成本在很大程度上通过更高价格转嫁给消费者,其余部分由生产率提升抵消。工人因工资与就业同时上升而受益。这些模式表明,工会能够抵消雇主的买方垄断势力,而企业反应——从而最终由谁承担成本——在很大程度上取决于市场结构。总体而言,在这一情境下,工会化主要实现了从消费者(而非股东)的再分配,其效应在企业之间差异显著,包括资源向规模更大、生产率更高的企业重新配置。我们用一个包含产品市场与劳动力市场势力的工会谈判局部均衡模型来解释这些模式。
Abstract
Abstract If unions raise worker wages, who pays? We provide a comprehensive assessment of firm responses to increased unionization, using changes in the tax deductibility of union dues in Norway as a quasi-exogenous source of variation in firm-level union density. In the average private sector firm, higher union density raises labor costs and leads firms to contract employment and production, lowering profits without increasing the labor share. The incidence is shared: consumers bear part of the cost through higher prices, shareholders through lower profits, and the remainder is offset by productivity improvements. The total wage bill falls, with losses concentrated among less-attached “outsider” workers. Firm responses vary systematically by the degree of market competition. In manufacturing, where firms operate in less competitive product and labor markets, the response is reversed: the average firm expands employment and production, reduces labor markdowns, and does not experience profit declines. Instead, higher labor costs are largely passed on to consumers through higher prices, with the remainder offset by productivity gains. Workers benefit as both wages and employment rise. These patterns suggest that unions can offset employer monopsony power and that firm responses–and therefore who ultimately bears the cost-depend importantly on market structure. Overall, unionization in this setting primarily redistributes from consumers rather than shareholders and has effects that differ sharply across firms, including a reallocation toward larger and more productive firms. We rationalize these patterns using a partial-equilibrium model of union bargaining with product- and labor-market power.