← ireadpaper · 顶刊中的公共政策研究

激进化

Radicalisation
The Economic Journal · 2024 · Jean‐Paul Carvalho、Michael Sacks

中文摘要

本文分析激进运动的兴起以及反激进化政策的设计。一个群体从参与基于身份的活动中获得意义,而一个前瞻性的组织则为这些活动提供平台。激进化的预警信号是组织的文化纯化,即筛选掉温和派并只招募激进派。虽然这会缩小俱乐部规模,却使其走上了一条规模随时间扩大、立场随时间愈发极端的增长路径。常规的反激进化政策可能适得其反。我们所识别的激进化机制可以通过温和的反激进信息传递和消除刻板印象的信息干预来瓦解。

Abstract

Abstract This paper analyses the rise of radical movements and the design of counter-radicalisation policies. A group derives meaning from participation in identity-based activities and a forward-looking organisation provides a platform for these activities. The warning sign for radicalisation is cultural purification by the organisation, i.e., the screening out of moderates and exclusive recruitment of radicals. While this shrinks the club, it puts it on a growth path along which it becomes larger and more extreme over time. Conventional counter-radicalisation policies can backfire. The radicalisation mechanisms we identify can be disabled by mild anti-radical messaging and informational interventions that eliminate stereotypes.
在 ireadpaper 查看全部 →