Party politics, inter-jurisdictional cooperation and law enforcement: Evidence from Mexico
Journal of Public Economics · 2025 · Depetris-Chauvin, Emilio、Durante, Ruben、Gutierrez, Emilio
中文摘要
我们研究党派政治如何影响联邦制下的辖区间合作与公共品供给。我们聚焦于墨西哥的执法问题,该国暴力犯罪高发、党派分野鲜明。利用选情接近的市政选举构建断点回归设计(RDD),我们发现,在多数邻市执政的政党以微弱优势赢得当地选举的市镇,比该党以微弱劣势落败的市镇更有可能与邻市开展执法合作,这一效应在暴力活动广泛蔓延的时期尤为突出。这种合作反过来改善了犯罪预防,并显著降低凶杀率,且由同一政党执政的邻市越多,效应越大。无论政党身份如何、是否在位,以及是否与联邦或州政府当局合作,这些结果均成立。总体而言,我们的研究结果表明:尽管在存在地理溢出效应的情况下,横向合作能够改善地方公共品供给,但党派分歧可能会阻碍这一进程。
Abstract
We study how partisan politics affect inter-jurisdictional cooperation and public good provision in federal systems. We focus on law enforcement in Mexico, a country marked by high violent crime and strong partisan cleavages. Using a Regression Discontinuity Design in close municipal elections, we show that municipalities where the party in power in most neighbors barely won are more likely to cooperate with their neighbors on law enforcement than those where it barely lost, especially during periods of widespread violence. Such cooperation, in turn, improves crime prevention and significantly reduces homicide rates, with effects increasing the more neighbors are governed by the same party. These results hold regardless of party identity, incumbency, or cooperation with federal or state authorities. Overall, our findings indicate that while horizontal cooperation can improve local public goods in the presence of geographical spillovers, partisan divisions may hinder this process.