← ireadpaper · 顶刊中的公共政策研究

面向声誉敏感型买方的自我规制:中国的 SA8000

Self-Regulation for Reputation-Sensitive Buyers: SA8000 in China
Management Science · 2025 · Greg Distelhorst、Judith C. Stroehle、Duanyi Yang

中文摘要

不同行业和企业采用自我规制制度的动机各异。本研究提出并检验了关于一种动机的命题——利用与声誉敏感型买方做生意的机会——并将其与为抵御监管或行动主义威胁而进行的自我规制区分开来。为研究面向声誉敏感型买方的自我规制的采用及其效果,我们考察了 2000 年代初期中国大型企业中的 SA8000 社会责任就业认证。利用官方纵向产业微观数据,我们检验了由这一假定的自我规制动机所生成的假说,发现:(a) 尽管存在对认证机构可能腐败的担忧,中国采用 SA8000 的企业在认证前的工人工资高于可比未采用企业;(b) 自我规制带来了就业增加以及对外国市场销售的增加,而声誉敏感型买方正集中于这些市场;(c) 对出口的正向效应大于对国内销售的(不显著、符号为负的)效应;(d) 没有证据表明自我规制在初始较高起点之外进一步提高了工人工资。将这些发现与以往关于其他动机下行业自我规制的研究相对照,本研究凸显了采用模式与下游效应如何随自我规制的受众不同而存在差异。

Abstract

Industries and firms have diverse motives for adopting self-regulatory institutions. This research develops and tests propositions about one motive—exploiting opportunities to do business with reputation-sensitive buyers—as distinct from self-regulation to defend against regulatory or activist threats. To study the adoption and effects of self-regulation for reputation-sensitive buyers, we study the SA8000 socially responsible employment certification among large firms in China in the early 2000s. Using official longitudinal industrial microdata, we test hypotheses generated by this assumed motive for self-regulation and find that (a) despite concerns about the corruptibility of certification bodies, SA8000 adopters in China exhibited higher precertification worker wages than comparable nonadopters, (b) self-regulation led to increased employment and sales to foreign markets, where reputation-sensitive buyers are concentrated, (c) the positive effect on exports was greater than the (insignificant, negatively signed) effect on domestic sales, and (d) there is no evidence that self-regulation increased worker wages beyond the initial high start. Contrasting these findings with prior research on industry self-regulation for other motives, this study highlights how both adoption patterns and downstream effects differ according to the audience for self-regulation.
在 ireadpaper 查看全部 →