How Work Becomes Invisible: The Erosion of the Wage Floor for Workers with Disabilities
American Sociological Review · 2024 · Emily H. Ruppel
中文摘要
劳动是如何被建构为对劳动者的一种服务的?在美国,向残障劳动者支付低于最低标准的工资自1938年起即为合法,并因1986年立法取消了此前规定的最低工资50%的下限而得以固化。本文利用第一手历史资料解释这些修正案的通过过程,并将其分析为一个去劳动化(delaborization)的案例——即劳动本身被神秘化并被重新归类为其他事物(如服务)的过程。我发现,在去机构化之后,面向残障体力劳动者的隔离工坊的管理者逐渐掌握了残障就业政策的主导权。专业人士动员残障污名,将低于最低标准的工资界定为属于其专业职能的社会福利议题,并成功游说使其固化。残障—劳工联盟的内部弱点使得这种职权抢占成为可能。本研究揭示了专业权威、工会的退场以及基于身份的污名是推动去劳动化的主要机制,而去劳动化是影响当代劳动组织方式的一股重要力量。低于最低标准工资的案例由此对劳动、残障与政治的社会学文献作出了拓展。
Abstract
How does work come to be constructed as a service to the worker? In the United States, the payment of subminimum wages to disabled workers has been legal since 1938 and was entrenched by 1986 legislation eliminating the previously mandated floor of 50 percent of the minimum wage. This article draws on primary historical materials to explain the passage of these amendments, which I analyze as a case of delaborization , a process through which work is mystified as such and reclassified as something else (e.g., service). I find that the managers of segregated workshops for disabled manual laborers rose to control disability employment policy in the aftermath of deinstitutionalization. Professionals mobilized disability stigma to frame the subminimum wage as a social welfare issue subject to their expertise and to lobby successfully for its entrenchment. Weaknesses in the disability–labor coalition enabled this seizure of jurisdiction. This research illuminates professional expertise, the withdrawal of labor unions, and identity-based stigma as major mechanisms driving delaborization, an important contemporary influence on the organization of work. The case of the subminimum wage thus develops sociological literatures on labor, disability, and politics.