← ireadpaper · 顶刊中的公共政策研究

是策略性行为还是困惑的企业?来自乌干达“缺失”交易的证据

Strategic or Confused Firms? Evidence from “Missing” Transactions in Uganda
Review of Economics and Statistics · 2024 · Miguel Almunia、Jonas Hjort、Justine Knebelmann、Lin Tian

中文摘要

企业是精于算计的最大化者,还是看似在犯错?利用乌干达增值税申报表的交易数据,我们发现尽管发票易于交叉核对,但79%的情况下卖方和买方申报的金额并不一致。我们的估计表明,多数企业是“有利型误报者”,但有25%是“不利型误报者”,后者系统性地高报自身销售额减采购额,从而使其纳税义务增加。同样,许多企业——尤其是不利型误报者——未对其自身已在海关申报的进口投入品进行增值税申报,从而增加了其纳税义务。净效应而言,单边增值税误报使乌干达在2013—2016年间损失了约3.84亿美元的税收收入。

Abstract

Are firms sophisticated maximizers, or do they appear to make mistakes? Using transaction data from Ugandan value-added tax returns, we show that sellers and buyers report different amounts 79% of the time, despite invoices being easily cross-checked. Our estimates suggest that most firms are “advantageous misreporters,” but that 25% are “disadvantageous misreporters” who systematically overreport own sales minus purchases such that their tax liability increases. Similarly, many firms—especially disadvantageous misreporters—fail to VAT-report imported inputs they themselves reported at Customs, increasing their liability. On net, unilateral VAT misreporting cost Uganda about US$384 million in foregone 2013–2016 tax revenue.
在 ireadpaper 查看全部 →