← ireadpaper · 顶刊中的公共政策研究

制药业的专利、创新与竞争: 《哈奇-韦克斯曼法案》40 年后

Patents, Innovation, and Competition in Pharmaceuticals: The Hatch-Waxman Act After 40 Years
Journal of Economic Perspectives · 2025 · [{"name": "C. Scott Hemphill", "affiliation": ["New York Law School"]}, {"name": "Bhaven N. Sampat", "affiliation": ["National Bureau of Economic Research"]}]

中文摘要

制药行业的一个核心政策问题是,如何在新药的动态收益与现有药品低价的静态收益之间进行权衡。在美国,这一权衡由《Hatch-Waxman法案》设定。我们回顾该法案的起源与关键特征,随后呈现其对竞争和创新影响的证据。在竞争方面,我们展示了该法案如何激励品牌药企业积累专利、激励仿制药企业挑战这些专利,其结果是形成一种大致的僵局。我们还讨论了品牌药企业为延迟仿制药进入所采取的策略。在创新方面,我们表明,该法案的专利期延长条款——旨在让品牌药企业弥补其在临床试验和监管审查期间损失的时间——并不完善,导致了潜在的扭曲。最终结果是,平衡创新与竞争的方式变得复杂且昂贵。

Abstract

A central policy issue in pharmaceuticals is how to balance the dynamic benefits of new drugs against the static benefits of low prices for existing drugs. In the United States, that balance is set by the Hatch-Waxman Act. We review the Act's origins and key features, then present evidence on its effects on competition and innovation. On the competition side, we show how the Act creates incentives for brands to accumulate patents and generics to challenge them, with the result being a rough stalemate. We also discuss strategies deployed by brands to delay generic entry. On the innovation side, we show that the Act's patent extension provisions — which aim to allow branded firms to make up for time lost during clinical trials and regulatory review — are incomplete, resulting in potential distortions. The net result is a convoluted and expensive approach to balancing innovation and competition.
在 ireadpaper 查看全部 →