← ireadpaper · 顶刊中的公共政策研究

项目资格复审成本:来自SNAP的证据

Program Recertification Costs: Evidence from SNAP
American Economic Journal: Economic Policy · 2021 · Tatiana Alexandra Homonoff、Jason Somerville

中文摘要

家计调查型项目的参与者必须通过资格复审程序定期证明其资格。如果所有未通过资格复审的案例都不符合资格,那么该程序的具体时间安排本应无关紧要。我们发现,补充营养援助计划(SNAP)中较晚的资格复审面谈安排会减少重新安排错过的面谈的时间,从而使资格复审成功率下降22%。因面谈安排较晚而未通过资格复审的后果高度偏斜:大多数案例很快重新入册,而四分之一则退出SNAP超过一年。边际被退册案例的贫困程度与平均参与者相当,这表明较晚的面谈安排导致了低效的筛查。

Abstract

Participants in means-tested programs must periodically document eligibility through a recertification process. If all cases that fail recertification are ineligible, the exact timing of this process should be irrelevant. We find that later recertification interview assignments for the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), which leave less time to reschedule missed interviews, decrease recertification success by 22 percent. The consequences of not recertifying due to later interviews are highly skewed: most cases quickly reenroll, while one-quarter remain off SNAP for over a year. The marginal disenrolled case is as needy as the average participant, suggesting inefficient screening from late interviews.
在 ireadpaper 查看全部 →