← ireadpaper · 顶刊中的公共政策研究

族群分裂的政治边界

The Political Boundaries of Ethnic Divisions
American Economic Journal: Applied Economics · 2021 · Samuel Bazzi、Matthew Gudgeon

中文摘要

我们利用印度尼西亚的一项政策实验,展示地方政治边界如何影响族群关系紧张。沿族群界线重新划定县界减少了冲突。然而,当新边界加剧族群极化时,稳定性方面的收益会被抵消甚至逆转。极化程度加剧导致多数决制选举期间暴力增多,但在利害较低的比例代表制选举期间几乎没有影响。这些结果表明,在公共资源可争夺的赢者通吃环境中,存在独特的暴力激励。总体而言,我们的发现揭示了在多元化国家重新划定边界的前景与陷阱——在这些国家,让每个族群都拥有自己的行政单元并不可行。

Abstract

We use a policy experiment in Indonesia to show how local political boundaries affect ethnic tension. Redrawing district borders along group lines reduces conflict. However, the gains in stability are undone or even reversed when new boundaries increase ethnic polarization. Greater polarization leads to more violence around majoritarian elections but has little effect around lower-stakes, proportional representation elections. These results point to distinct incentives for violence in winner-take-all settings with contestable public resources. Overall, our findings illustrate the promise and pitfalls of redrawing borders in diverse countries where it is infeasible for each group to have its own administrative unit.
在 ireadpaper 查看全部 →