← ireadpaper · 顶刊中的公共政策研究

羞辱作为防止偷窃的激励机制:行为与生理证据

Shaming as an incentive mechanism against stealing: Behavioral and physiological evidence
Journal of Public Economics · 2021 · Isabelle Brocas、Juan D. Carrillo、Mallory Montgomery

中文摘要

我们通过实验研究个体对他人花费成本生产的物品是选择偷窃还是付费购买的决策。我们考察两种情形:第一种情形下,偷窃被抓的受试者将被处以名义罚金;第二种情形下,通过公开个体身份(即羞辱)来加重处罚。我们还收集了皮肤电反应,以更好地理解促成选择的情绪唤起。在行为层面,我们发现引入羞辱后偷窃显著减少。更重要的是,决策时的情绪反应与行为高度相关:具体而言,情绪唤起更强的受试者在第一种情形下更可能偷窃,在第二种情形下也更可能停止偷窃。基于这一生理证据,我们构建了一个理论模型,其中当期决策会累积形成“道德存量”,而道德存量又进而影响未来偷窃的成本,从而影响未来决策。对该模型的结构估计拟合良好,同时捕捉了个体间的异质性。

Abstract

We study experimentally the decision of an individual to steal or pay for an object that is produced at a cost by another individual. We consider two conditions. In the first condition, subjects caught stealing are sanctioned with a nominal fee. In the second condition, the sanction is increased by making the identity of the individual public (shaming). We also collect skin conductance responses to better understand the emotional arousal conducive to choices. Behaviorally, we show that stealing decreases significantly when shaming is introduced. More importantly, the emotional response at the time of decision strongly correlates with behavior. In particular, subjects who are more aroused are more likely to steal in the first condition, and also more likely to stop stealing in the second condition. Based on this physiological evidence, we develop a theoretical model where current decisions contribute to a “moral stock”, which in turns affects the future cost of stealing and therefore the future decisions. The structural estimation of this model provides a good fit while capturing the heterogeneity across individuals.
在 ireadpaper 查看全部 →