The RAND Journal of Economics · 2025 · Amal Ahmad、Dominik Naeher、Sebastián Vollmer
中文摘要
通过买断来激励创新可以缓解与专利权力相关的社会成本, 但这一潜在重要融资机制的政治经济学与可行性尚缺乏充分研究。我们研究一个各国创新与融资能力不同的国际环境, 其中出资的政府依靠税收为买断筹资, 并在意其决策的选举支持度。随后各国之间会产生分配冲突: 一些国家可能从现已公开的知识中获益, 却未为融资作出同等贡献; 而一国内部的纳税人也可能就买断所需税收融资的合意程度存在分歧。我们证明, 相对于专利, 这些冲突降低了买断的可行性, 识别出这种冲突在何种条件下损害全球福利, 并讨论了克服这些约束的可能性。买断的国际公共品维度与公共融资维度, 对于理解其取代专利并改善社会福利的潜力至关重要。
Abstract
ABSTRACT Incentivizing innovation through buyouts may alleviate the social costs associated with patent power, but the political economy and feasibility of this potentially important financing mechanism have been understudied. We study an international setting of countries with different innovation and financing capabilities, and where financing governments rely on taxes to fund buyouts and care about the electoral popularity of their decisions. Subsequent distributional conflict arises between countries as some may benefit from the now‐public knowledge without contributing equally to financing, whereas taxpayers within a country may disagree over the desired extent of tax financing for buyouts. We show that these conflicts reduce the feasibility of buyouts relative to patents, identify the conditions under which this harms global welfare, and discuss possibilities for overcoming these constraints. The international public good and public financing dimensions of buyouts emerge as essential for understanding their potential to supplant patents and to improve social welfare.