← ireadpaper · 顶刊中的公共政策研究

人员派遣机构与内部谈判

Staffing agencies and in-house bargaining
Journal of Monetary Economics · 2026 · Agneta Berge、Ann‐Sofie Kolm、Per L. Krusell

中文摘要

如今,许多生产性企业并不直接雇用工人,而是从“劳务派遣机构”租用工人;劳务派遣机构的主要业务是寻找、雇用工人并将其租借给生产性企业。这样一来,生产性企业无需承担搜寻的直接成本,而是在竞争性市场中租用工人。我们运用标准的搜寻—匹配理论分析这一现象,其中生产性企业具有递减的规模报酬。我们发现,劳务派遣机构的存在本身就会对企业与其雇用的“自有”工人之间的议价产生重要影响:企业可以策略性地利用租用工人来削弱自有工人的议价地位,使议价结果向自身倾斜。这对工资和就业具有一阶效应。如果租用工人在生产和搜寻市场上与自有工人完全相同,则唯一的均衡是生产性企业只使用租用工人的均衡。如果租用工人涉及额外成本,则均衡表现为内点解,即每家企业从两个来源获取工人。

Abstract

Nowadays, many producing firms do not hire workers, but rent them from “staffing agencies”, whose main activity is to find, employ, and rent out workers to producing firms. That way, producing firms do not bear the direct costs of search and instead rent workers in a competitive market. We employ standard search-and-matching theory to analyze this phenomenon, with producing firms that have decreasing returns to scale. We find that the mere presence of staffing agencies has an important impact on the bargaining between the firms and their hired, “in-house” workers: firms can strategically use rented workers to weaken the bargaining position of in-house workers, tilting bargaining in their own favor. This has first-order effects on wages and employment. If rented and in-house workers are identical in production and in search markets, the unique equilibrium is one where producing firms only use rented workers. If renting workers involve additional costs, the equilibrium features an interior solution where each firm procures workers from two sources.
在 ireadpaper 查看全部 →