← ireadpaper · 顶刊中的公共政策研究

如何约束金融市场: 声誉是不够的

How To Discipline Financial Markets: Reputation Is Not Enough
Journal of the European Economic Association · 2024 · [{"name": "Maria Bigoni", "affiliation": ["University of Bologna"]}, {"name": "Gabriele Camera", "affiliation": ["Chapman University"]}, {"name": "Marco Casari", "affiliation": ["University of Bologna"]}]

中文摘要

摘要 历史上,源自金融部门的冲击常常外溢至实体部门,并带来严重后果。我们在实验室中研究了针对金融中介机构信息披露和资本要求的干预,能否减少其资不抵债事件,或防止其负面影响向更广泛的经济蔓延。在我们的两部门经济中,消费者和生产者可以为金融中介机构提供资金,中介机构则反过来向他们提供用于结算交易的流动性。然而,中介机构可能从事高风险投资并陷入资不抵债,这会抑制实体经济活动。在实验中,资不抵债事件频繁发生。因此,消费者和生产者常常拒绝为中介机构提供资金,从而降低了交易量。强制披露高风险投资并未减少风险承担和资不抵债事件。相反,施加资本要求阻止了资不抵债事件对实体经济活动的破坏,从而促进了金融中介活动与交易。

Abstract

Abstract Historically, shocks originating in the financial sector often spilled over into the real sector with dramatic consequences. We study in the lab how interventions targeting disclosure and capital requirements of financial intermediaries can reduce insolvencies or prevent their negative effects from propagating to the broader economy. In our two-sector economy, consumers and producers can fund financial intermediaries, who, in turn, provide them with liquidity to settle trades. However, intermediaries may undertake risky investments and become insolvent, which depresses real economic activity. In the experiment, insolvencies were frequent. As a consequence, consumers and producers often refused to fund intermediaries, which lowered the trade volume. Imposing the disclosure of risky investments did not reduce risk-taking and insolvencies. Instead, imposing capital requirements prevented insolvencies from disrupting real economic activity, thus boosting financial intermediation and trade.
在 ireadpaper 查看全部 →