"未准备好"作为富有成效的警钟:第二次机会能否改善人力资本投资?
“Not ready” as a productive wake-up call: Do second chances improve human capital investments?
Journal of Public Economics · 2026 · [{"name": "Thorbjørn Sejr Guul", "affiliation": ["University of Southern Denmark", "Aarhus University", "TrygFonden"]}, {"name": "Søren Albeck Nielsen", "affiliation": ["Aarhus University", "TrygFonden"]}]
中文摘要
我们研究了丹麦的一项政策改革,该改革在初中毕业前1.5年,引入了用于衡量学生升读高中学业准备情况的GPA(平均绩点)门槛。门槛附近的学生获得了关于其学业表现的相似信息,但刚低于门槛的学生被标记为"未准备好",并通过次年的重新评估获得第二次机会。利用模糊断点回归设计,我们发现刚低于门槛的学生提高了其初中最终GPA,更有可能完成高中学业,并且随后更有可能进入高等教育。这些效应主要由学生努力程度的提高所驱动,表现为尽责性提高和兼职工作减少,而非学校或父母投资的变化。重要的是,我们没有发现对学生福祉的不利影响。正向效应在低社会经济背景的学生和女生中尤为显著,但我们在所有子群体中均观察到有益影响。我们的结果表明,入学标准与第二次机会相结合,可以显著改善学生的教育轨迹,尤其是在向高中教育过渡的阶段。• 带有第二次机会选项的"未准备好"信号会激励学生投资。• 改善学业表现,提升长期教育获得。• 效应主要通过学生更大的努力和勤勉产生。• 设有第二次机会的入学标准可以在不产生不利影响的情况下激发学生动机。
Abstract
We study a policy reform in Denmark that introduced a GPA threshold for academic readiness for upper secondary education 1.5 years before the end of middle school. Students near the threshold received similar information about their academic performance, but those just below it were labeled “not ready” and offered a second chance through reevaluation the following year. Using a fuzzy regression discontinuity design, we find that students just below the threshold improved their final middle school GPA, were more likely to complete high school, and subsequently more likely to enroll in post-secondary education. These effects are driven primarily by increased student effort, evidenced by higher conscientiousness and reduced part-time work, rather than changes in school or parental investment. Importantly, we find no adverse effects on student well-being. The positive effects are especially pronounced among students from low socioeconomic backgrounds and among girls, but we observe beneficial impacts across all subgroups. Our results suggest that entry criteria combined with second-chance opportunities can substantially improve students’ educational trajectories, particularly in the transition to upper secondary education. • A “not ready” signal with second-chance options spurs student investment. • Improves academic performance and long-term educational attainment. • Effects arise primarily through greater student effort and diligence. • Entry criteria with second chances can motivate without adverse impacts.
在 ireadpaper 查看全部 →