从房产收益到养老金损失:揭示智利财富不平等动态的微观-宏观整合
From housing gains to pension losses: Micro-macro integration to reveal wealth inequality dynamics in Chile
Journal of Public Economics · 2026 · [{"name": "Bastián Castro Nofal", "affiliation": ["University of Chile"]}, {"name": "Ignacio Flores", "affiliation": ["Roma Tre University", "Paris School of Economics"]}, {"name": "Pablo Gutiérrez Cubillos", "affiliation": ["University of Chile"]}]
中文摘要
本文考察了2007年至2021年间智利财富不平等的水平与动态,其背景是私人养老金体系具有强制性,且政府住房政策以私人所有权为核心。我们聚焦两大宏观经济事件:2016年对新建住房征收增值税后房价的急剧上涨,以及近期疫情期间通过提前支取导致的养老金资产大规模清算。为此,我们扩展现有方法,运用机器学习技术将行政养老金基金余额整合进家庭财富调查,构建了一个微观—宏观一致的财富分布。结果显示财富高度集中:顶层1%持有约三分之一的私人总财富——这一水平与美国的观测值相当——主要由其对金融资产的不成比例持有所驱动。相比之下,底层50%仅持有7%至9%的财富,且主要以住房和养老金资产形式持有,这一份额高于大多数欧洲国家报告的水平。我们还发现该时期内财富不平等出现温和下降,尤其是在2016年之后。反事实分析表明,这一下降反映了两股相反力量的相互作用:住房升值主要惠及底层90%的家庭,而养老金支取则降低了整个分布上的财富,同时相对加剧了不平等。我们关于水平、趋势和反事实的发现,在替代性方法设定下均具有稳健性。
Abstract
This paper examines the levels and dynamics of wealth inequality in Chile between 2007 and 2021, in a context where the private pension system is mandatory and government housing policies are centered on private ownership. We focus on two major macroeconomic events: the sharp increase in housing prices following the introduction of a value-added tax on new dwellings in 2016 and the large-scale liquidation of pension assets through early withdrawals during the recent pandemic. To do so, we construct a micro–macro consistent wealth distribution by extending existing methodologies to integrate administrative pension fund balances into household wealth surveys using machine learning techniques. Our results reveal pronounced wealth concentration: the top 1% hold roughly one-third of total private wealth—levels comparable to those observed in the United States—driven by their disproportionate ownership of financial assets. By contrast, the bottom 50% hold 7–9%, primarily through housing and pension assets, shares that exceed those reported in most European countries. We also document a modest decline in wealth inequality over the period, particularly after 2016. A counterfactual analysis suggests that this decline reflects the interaction of two opposing forces: housing appreciation, which predominantly benefited the bottom 90% of households, and pension withdrawals, which reduced wealth across the distribution while relatively increasing inequality. Our findings on levels, trends, and counterfactuals are robust across alternative methodological specifications.
在 ireadpaper 查看全部 →