← ireadpaper · 顶刊中的公共政策研究

贸易保护对环境的非预期后果

The unintended consequences of trade protection on the environment
Journal of Development Economics · 2025 · [{"name": "Taipeng Li", "affiliation": ["Hunan University"]}, {"name": "Lorenzo Trimarchi", "affiliation": ["University of Namur"]}, {"name": "Rui Xie", "affiliation": ["Hunan University"]}, {"name": "Guohao Yang", "affiliation": ["Liaoning University"]}]

中文摘要

我们以2018—2019年美中贸易战为准自然实验,分析不断上升的贸易壁垒如何通过政治激励削弱中国的环境监管。利用中国地级市对美国关税暴露程度的差异,采用双重差分策略,我们发现暴露程度更高的地区在统计上显著降低了环境监管重视程度,并提高了污染限值。这一反应是通过政治激励渠道实现的:有政治关联的中国官员更容易放松标准,而在暴露地区这样做的官员获得更高的晋升概率。利用卫星数据和工具变量,我们表明这种放松监管增加了中国的二氧化碳排放。虽然未发现对总体经济活动有统计显著影响,但企业层面分析显示,环境放松监管有助于维持生产和就业,但这仅发生在实施了实质性监管变革的地级市。我们的结果首次提供证据表明,针对环境制度薄弱国家的保护主义政策可能引发监管标准的“逐底竞争”。

Abstract

Using the 2018–2019 US–China trade war as a quasi-natural experiment, we analyze how rising trade barriers undermine environmental regulation in China through political incentives. Through a difference-in-differences strategy exploiting variation in Chinese prefecture-level exposure to US tariffs, we find more exposed areas significantly reduce environmental regulation emphasis and raise pollution limits. This response operates through political incentives: connected Chinese officials more readily relax standards, and those who do gain higher promotion probability in exposed areas. Using satellite data and instrumental variables, we show this deregulation increased CO 2 emissions in China. While finding no significant effects on aggregate economic activity, firm-level analysis reveals environmental deregulation helped sustain production and employment, but only in prefectures implementing substantial regulatory changes. Our results provide first evidence that protectionist policies targeting countries with weak environmental institutions may trigger a “race to the bottom” in regulatory standards.
在 ireadpaper 查看全部 →