← ireadpaper · 顶刊中的公共政策研究

动态税收

Dynamic Taxation
Annual Review of Economics · 2020 · [{"name": "Stefanie Stantcheva", "affiliation": ["Center for Economic and Policy Research", "National Bureau of Economic Research", "Harvard University"]}]

中文摘要

本文回顾了动态税收研究的最新进展,考察三种主要方法:动态 Mirrlees 方法、参数化 Ramsey 方法与充分统计量方法。在第一种方法中,个体赚取收入的异质能力属于私人信息,并随时间随机演化。动态税收在事前不受限制,是出于再分配和保险考虑而设定的。对资本征税仅是为了改善工作激励。若人力资本总体上能够降低税后不平等与风险,则应对其给予最优补贴。Ramsey 方法事前设定受限的税收工具,并采用定量方法,从而能够考察更复杂、更现实的经济体。当依年龄而定的劳动收入税不可行时,资本税是最优的。较新且易于处理的充分统计量方法推导出稳健的税收公式,这些公式取决于可估计的弹性及收入分布特征。借助一个新定义的标准——基于效用的稳态方法,该方法简化了过渡动态,并防止政府利用短期内的迟缓反应。这里的资本税基于标准的公平-效率权衡。

Abstract

This article reviews recent advances in the study of dynamic taxation, considering three main approaches: the dynamic Mirrlees, the parametric Ramsey, and the sufficient statistics approaches. In the first approach, agents’ heterogeneous abilities to earn income are private information and evolve stochastically over time. Dynamic taxes are not restricted ex ante and are set for redistribution and insurance considerations. Capital is taxed only in order to improve incentives to work. Human capital is optimally subsidized if it reduces posttax inequality and risk on balance. The Ramsey approach specifies ex ante restricted tax instruments and adopts quantitative methods, which allow it to consider more complex and realistic economies. Capital taxes are optimal when age-dependent labor income taxes are not possible. The newer and tractable sufficient statistics approach derives robust tax formulas that depend on estimable elasticities and features of the income distributions. It simplifies the transitional dynamics thanks to a newly defined criterion, the utility-based steady-state approach, which prevents the government from exploiting sluggish responses in the short run. Capital taxes are here based on the standard equity-efficiency trade-off.
在 ireadpaper 查看全部 →