转移支付与配套营养项目能否在项目结束四年后减少亲密伴侣暴力？
Can Transfers and Complementary Nutrition Programming Reduce Intimate Partner Violence Four Years Post-Program?
Journal of Human Resources · 2022 · [{"name": "Shalini Roy", "affiliation": ["International Food Policy Research Institute"]}, {"name": "Mélissa Hidrobo", "affiliation": ["International Food Policy Research Institute"]}, {"name": "John Hoddinott", "affiliation": ["International Food Policy Research Institute", "Cornell University"]}, {"name": "Bastien Koch", "affiliation": ["International Food Policy Research Institute"]}, {"name": "Akhter Ahmed", "affiliation": ["International Food Policy Research Institute", "Bangladesh University"]}]
中文摘要
关于转移支付项目所带来的亲密伴侣暴力（IPV）减少能否持续，现有认识有限。利用一项随机对照试验，我们发现，孟加拉国农村地区接受现金转移支付并配套营养项目（包括小组培训、入户访问和社区会议）的女性，在项目结束四年后仍经历了IPV的持续减少。单独的现金转移支付，以及配套或未配套营养项目的食物转移支付，均未显示出对IPV的持续影响。证据表明，现金转移支付配套营养项目通过持续提高女性议价能力、增加男性实施暴力的成本，并改善男性情绪福祉，从而维持了IPV的减少。
Abstract
<h3>Abstract</h3> Little is known about whether reductions in intimate partner violence (IPV) from transfer programs persist. Using a randomized controlled trial, we find that women in rural Bangladesh who received cash transfers with complementary nutrition programming (including group-based training, home visits, and community meetings) experienced sustained reductions in IPV four years after the program ended. Neither cash transfers alone, nor food transfers with or without complementary nutrition programming, showed sustained impacts on IPV. Evidence suggests that cash with complementary nutrition programming sustained IPV reductions through persistent increases in women’s bargaining power, costs to men of perpetrating violence, and men’s emotional well-being.