← ireadpaper · 顶刊中的公共政策研究

竞选融资放松管制对美国选举的均衡效应

The Equilibrium Effects of Campaign Finance Deregulation on U.S. Elections
Econometrica · 2026 · [{"name": "Christian Cox", "affiliation": ["University of Arizona"]}]

中文摘要

美国最高法院在2010年“联合公民诉联邦选举委员会案”(Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission)的裁决中放松了竞选融资管制,催生了一种拥有广泛筹款与支出自由的新型政治行动委员会——超级政治行动委员会(Super PAC)。这导致初选和大选中的竞选支出出现前所未有的激增。为评估超级政治行动委员会的影响,本文利用2010年至2020年美国国会选举数据,估计了一个政治竞争的多阶段模型。研究发现,双方超级政治行动委员会的支出会引发相互抵消的反应,导致净均衡效应有限。然而,通过放大捐赠者的作用,超级政治行动委员会仍有可能重塑选举格局。

Abstract

The U.S. Supreme Court's 2010 decision in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission deregulated campaign finance, enabling the rise of a new political action committee (the Super PAC) with broad freedom to raise and spend money. This led to an unprecedented surge in spending in primary and general elections. To evaluate the impact of Super PACs, I estimate a multistage model of political competition using data from U.S. Congressional elections between 2010 and 2020. I find that Super PAC spending by both sides prompts offsetting responses, resulting in limited net equilibrium effects. However, by amplifying the role of donors, Super PACs still have the potential to reshape the electoral landscape.
在 ireadpaper 查看全部 →