← ireadpaper · 顶刊中的公共政策研究

长期护理中的患者与提供者激励

Patient versus Provider Incentives in Long-Term Care
American Economic Journal: Applied Economics · 2024 · [{"name": "Martin B. Hackmann", "affiliation": []}, {"name": "Reinhard Pohl", "affiliation": ["Mathematica Policy Research"]}, {"name": "Nicolas R. Ziebarth", "affiliation": ["University of Mannheim", "Cornell University"]}]

中文摘要

患者与提供者激励如何影响长期护理的供给?我们对55.1万次养老院住宿记录的分析得出三点主要发现。第一,由于成本分担有限,医疗补助(Medicaid)覆盖的住民倾向于延长养老院住宿时间,而非转向社区护理。第二,当机构容量达到上限时,养老院会缩短医疗补助住民的住宿时间,以接纳利润更高的自费私人付费者。第三,提供者对财务激励的反应比患者更具弹性。因此,通过替代性支付模式(如按病例付费,episode-based reimbursement)来聚焦提供者激励,相较于提高患者成本分担,更能有效促进向社区护理的转型,并实现长期护理成本节约。

Abstract

How do patient and provider incentives affect the provision of long-term care? Our analysis of 551,000 nursing home stays yields three main insights. First, due to limited cost-sharing, Medicaid-covered residents prolong their nursing home stays instead of transitioning to community-based care. Second, when facility capacity binds, nursing homes shorten Medicaid stays to admit more profitable out-of-pocket private payers. Third, providers react more elastically to financial incentives than patients. Thus, targeting provider incentives through alternative payment models, such as episode-based reimbursement, is more effective than increasing patient cost sharing in facilitating transitions to community-based care and generating long-term care savings. (JEL H51, H75, I11, I13, I18, I38, L84)
在 ireadpaper 查看全部 →