中文摘要
我们将蒂利（Tilly）关于集体行动剧目的概念加以形式化，并分析国家镇压如何影响所观察到的抗争行动的多样性。当镇压随反政权行动水平的提高而加速（凸性镇压结构）时，反对派领导人倾向于号召多种不同形式的抗争行动，从而形成更广泛的剧目。相反，当镇压随抗争行动水平的提高而减速（凹性镇压结构，包括无差别镇压）时，反对派领导人倾向于只号召一种形式的抗争行动，从而形成更狭窄的剧目。在方法论上，我们为协调与委托相互交织的情境提供了一种分析。（JEL D71, D72, D74, D82）
Abstract
We formalize Tilly’s concept of repertoires of collective action and analyze how state repression affects the variety of observed contentious actions. When repression accelerates with higher levels of antiregime actions (convex repression structure), opposition leaders tend to call for many different forms of contentious actions, thereby generating a wider repertoire. In contrast, when repression decelerates with higher contentious actions (concave repression structure, including indiscriminate repression), opposition leaders tend to call for just one form of contentious action, thereby generating a narrower repertoire. Methodologically, we deliver an analysis for settings in which coordination and delegation are intertwined. (JEL D71, D72, D74, D82)