← ireadpaper · 顶刊中的公共政策研究

互不挖角协议

No-Poach Agreements
NBER Working Papers · 2026 · [{"name": "Axel Gottfries", "affiliation": []}, {"name": "Gregor Jarosch", "affiliation": []}]

中文摘要

我们使用一个将工人挖角置于劳动力市场竞争核心的工资张贴模型,研究互不挖角卡特尔。即使某地劳动力市场中十家雇主里只有两家合谋,全市场工资也会下降近5%。原因在于,互不挖角协议抑制了职业阶梯上的竞争,且这种效应会溢出到未参与合谋的企业。随后,我们将互不挖角协议与劳动力市场中另外两种反竞争行为——竞业禁止协议和工资操纵——进行比较。结果显示,互不挖角协议对工资的负面影响远大于其他两种行为。

Abstract

We study no-poach cartels using a wage-posting model that puts worker poaching at the center of labor market competition. Even when just two out of ten employers in a local labor market collude, wages fall by almost 5% market-wide. The reason is that no-poach agreements suppress competition along the job ladder, with spillovers to non-colluding firms. We then compare no-poach agreements to two other forms of anti-competitive conduct in the labor market: noncompete agreements and wage fixing. No-poach agreements have by far the largest negative wage effects.
在 ireadpaper 查看全部 →