公共与私人医疗体系之间的选择:来自退伍军人的证据
Choice Between Public and Private Healthcare Systems: Evidence from Veterans
NBER Working Papers · 2026 · [{"name": "Marika Cabral", "affiliation": []}, {"name": "David C. Chan Jr", "affiliation": []}, {"name": "Seth Neller", "affiliation": []}]
中文摘要
本文考察了老年退伍军人在公共与私人医疗体系之间的选择,这些退伍军人同时有资格通过公立的退伍军人健康管理局(VA)和由 Medicare 资助的私人医疗服务提供者获得医疗服务。我们分析了在 VA 利用率存在差异的地区之间迁移的退伍军人的医疗体系选择,以量化个体特定因素(如偏好、收入、健康状况)与地区特定因素(如当地可及性、质量和便利性)的相对重要性。我们的估计表明,VA 使用的地理差异中有 50–60% 可归因于需求侧的个体因素,其余部分由基于地域的因素解释。我们还记录了不同护理类型之间存在重要的异质性:基于地域的因素对住院和急诊护理的作用大于对门诊和初级护理的作用。进一步分析表明,近期立法中强调的供给侧特征——到 VA 设施的距离和等待时间——仅能解释估计的地区效应中的一小部分。这些发现凸显了个体因素在医疗体系选择中的重要性,并对旨在减少 VA 利用地理差异的政策具有启示意义。
Abstract
This paper examines the choice between public and private healthcare systems among elderly veterans, who are dually eligible to obtain care through the publicly operated Veterans Health Administration (VA) and through private providers financed by Medicare. We analyze health system choice among veterans who move across areas with differing rates of VA utilization to quantify the relative importance of individual-specific factors (e.g., preferences, income, health) and place-specific factors (e.g., local access, quality, and convenience). Our estimates indicate that 50–60% of geographic variation in VA use is attributable to demand-side individual factors, with the remainder explained by place-based factors. We also document important heterogeneity across types of care, with place-based factors playing a larger role for inpatient and emergency care than for outpatient and primary care. Additional analysis suggests that the supply-side features emphasized in recent legislation—distance to VA facilities and wait times—explain only a small share of estimated place effects. These findings highlight the importance of individual factors in health system choice and have implications for policies aimed at reducing geographic disparities in VA utilization.
在 ireadpaper 查看全部 →