资格筛查不完善下的社会保险:理论与来自疫情失业保险的证据
Social Insurance with Imperfect Eligibility Screening: Theory and Evidence from Pandemic UI
NBER Working Papers · 2026 · [{"name": "Adam Isen", "affiliation": []}, {"name": "Elira Kuka", "affiliation": []}, {"name": "Bryan A. Stuart", "affiliation": []}]
中文摘要
本文研究资格筛查不完善条件下的社会保险问题,重点关注2020年和2021年扩张期间的失业保险(UI)。我们利用行政税务数据与UI政策识别异常支付,以此考察筛查不完善的程度,发现存在2140亿美元的潜在不当支付——集中于疫情失业援助(PUA)项目——其中约一半可通过改进联邦-州数据共享实现事前检测。这些不当支付存在显著的地域差异,边界设计表明这在一定程度上源于各州的政策决策。为评估其对最优政策的含义,我们首先进行模拟,用家计调查型的一次性转移支付替代PUA,发现这类转移支付本可以更低的行政成本更好地保障收入损失。其次,我们构建了一个选择加入型与自动型转移支付的模型,表明当不合格受助人通过福利筛查时,选择加入项目的瞄准优势可能发生逆转。以2020年UI数据为校准依据,该模型表明转向自动转移支付本可提高社会福利。
Abstract
This paper studies social insurance with imperfect eligibility screening, focusing on Unemployment Insurance (UI) during its expansion in 2020 and 2021. We study the extent of imperfect screening by identifying anomalous payments using administrative tax data and UI policies, finding $214 billion in potentially-improper payments—concentrated in the Pandemic Unemployment Assistance (PUA) program—with approximately half detectable ex-ante through improved federal-state data sharing. There is substantial geographic variation, and a border design shows this is partly due to policy decisions made by states. To assess the implications for optimal policy, we first conduct simulations that replace PUA with means-tested, lump-sum transfers, finding that these transfers would have better insured against income losses at lower administrative cost. Second, we develop a model of opt-in versus automatic transfers that shows the targeting advantage of opt-in programs can reverse when ineligible recipients pass the benefit screen. Calibrated to 2020 UI, the model implies that shifting toward automatic transfers would have increased social welfare.
在 ireadpaper 查看全部 →