← ireadpaper · 顶刊中的公共政策研究

土地安全与流动摩擦

Land Security and Mobility Frictions
Quarterly Journal of Economics · 2024 · Tasso Adamopoulos、Loren Brandt、Chaoran Chen、Diego Restuccia、Xiaoyun Wei

中文摘要

阻碍劳动者跨职业和空间流动的摩擦是发展中国家的一个突出特征。我们将不安全产权与其他劳动力流动摩擦区分开来,考察二者对劳动力从农业向非农业、从农村向城市重新配置的作用。我们将中国丰富的家庭和个人层面面板数据,与一个以劳动者跨地区和职业排序为特征的均衡量化框架相结合。我们对务农家庭以及由谁经营家庭农场、谁可能迁移的内生决策进行显式建模,从而刻画家庭内部的另一条选择渠道。我们发现,土地权利不安全对农业生产率和结构转型具有显著的负面影响,使经营农场的农村家庭占比提高逾40个百分点,并使农业生产率下降20%以上。相较而言,这些量化效应与所有剩余劳动力流动摩擦产生的效应同样大。我们测得,2004—2018年间中国经济中的总体劳动力流动壁垒大幅降低,这完全可由土地安全的改善所解释,与该时期中国覆盖农村土地的改革相一致。JEL分类号:O11、O14、O4、E02、Q1。

Abstract

Abstract Frictions that impede the mobility of workers across occupations and space are a prominent feature of developing countries. We disentangle the role of insecure property rights from other labor-mobility frictions for the reallocation of labor from agriculture to nonagriculture and from rural to urban areas. We combine rich household and individual-level panel data from China and an equilibrium quantitative framework featuring sorting of workers across locations and occupations. We explicitly model the farming household and the endogenous decisions of who operates the family farm and who potentially migrates, capturing an additional channel of selection in the household. We find that land insecurity has substantial negative effects on agricultural productivity and structural change, raising the share of rural households operating farms by over 40 percentage points and depressing agricultural productivity by more than 20%. Comparatively, these quantitative effects are as large as those from all residual labor-mobility frictions. We measure a sharp reduction in overall labor-mobility barriers over 2004–2018 in the Chinese economy, all accounted for by improved land security, consistent with reforms covering rural land in China during the period. JEL Codes: O11, O14, O4, E02, Q1.
在 ireadpaper 查看全部 →