新前沿:新工作的起源与内容,1940–2018年
New Frontiers: The Origins and Content of New Work, 1940–2018
Quarterly Journal of Economics · 2024 · [{"name": "David Autor", "affiliation": ["National Bureau of Economic Research", "Moscow Institute of Thermal Technology", "Massachusetts Institute of Technology"]}, {"name": "Caroline Chin", "affiliation": ["Massachusetts Institute of Technology"]}, {"name": "Anna Salomons", "affiliation": ["Utrecht University"]}, {"name": "Bryan Seegmiller", "affiliation": ["Northwestern University"]}]
中文摘要
我们围绕新出现的职业类别("新工作")在抵消任务替代型自动化对劳动需求侵蚀效应中被假定发挥的作用,回答三个核心问题:新工作的实质内容是什么、它源自何处,以及它对劳动需求有何影响?我们构建了一个涵盖八十年新职业名称的新型数据库,并将其与美国人口普查微观数据以及基于专利衡量的各职业对劳动增强型创新和劳动自动化型创新暴露程度的指标相连接。当前就业中的大多数岗位属于1940年以来出现的新职业专门领域,但新工作创造的重心已发生转移:1940—1980年主要集中于中等薪酬的生产和文职职业,1980年以来转向高薪专业职业,其次是低薪服务职业。新工作的产生,是对补充职业产出的技术创新、以及提高职业需求的需求冲击的回应;而使任务自动化或降低职业需求的创新,则会减缓新工作的出现。尽管在各职业中,增强型创新与自动化型创新的流量呈正相关,但前者会提升职业劳动需求,后者则会抑制职业劳动需求。过去四十年中,自动化创新对需求的侵蚀效应有所增强,而增强型创新对需求的提升效应并未随之增强。
Abstract
Abstract We answer three core questions about the hypothesized role of newly emerging job categories (“new work”) in counterbalancing the erosive effect of task-displacing automation on labor demand: what is the substantive content of new work, where does it come from, and what effect does it have on labor demand? We construct a novel database spanning eight decades of new job titles linked to U.S. Census microdata and to patent-based measures of occupations’ exposure to labor-augmenting and labor-automating innovations. The majority of current employment is in new job specialties introduced since 1940, but the locus of new-work creation has shifted from middle-paid production and clerical occupations over 1940–1980 to high-paid professional occupations and secondarily to low-paid services since 1980. New work emerges in response to technological innovations that complement the outputs of occupations and demand shocks that raise occupational demand. Innovations that automate tasks or reduce occupational demand slow new-work emergence. Although the flow of augmentation and automation innovations is positively correlated across occupations, the former boosts occupational labor demand while the latter depresses it. The demand-eroding effects of automation innovations have intensified in the past four decades while the demand-increasing effects of augmentation innovations have not.
在 ireadpaper 查看全部 →