在哪里学与学什么
Where versus What
Journal of Human Resources · 2022 · [{"name": "Esteban Aucejo", "affiliation": ["Center for Economic and Policy Research"]}, {"name": "Claudia Hupkau", "affiliation": ["Hudson Institute"]}, {"name": "Jenifer Ruiz-Valenzuela", "affiliation": ["Barcelona School of Economics"]}]
中文摘要
我们利用教育与劳动力市场轨迹的行政记录，估计英格兰继续教育学院在教育和劳动力市场结果方面的增值，以及这些学院所授不同学习领域的收入回报。我们发现，与不同学习领域之间收入回报的差异相比，各学院在劳动力市场结果方面的增值离散程度较为温和。我们进一步表明，劳动力市场结果方面的增值与学业结果方面的增值相关。我们的结论是，在英格兰继续教育中，学什么往往比在哪里学更重要。
Abstract
<h3>Abstract</h3> We use administrative records on educational and labor market trajectories to estimate the value-added of English further education colleges in terms of educational and labor market outcomes and earnings returns to different fields of study taught at these colleges. We find that dispersion in college value-added in terms of labor market outcomes is moderate compared to differences in earnings returns across fields of study. We further show that value-added in labor market outcomes is correlated with value-added in academic outcomes. We conclude that in English further education, <i>what</i> one studies tends to matter more than <i>where</i> one does so.