← ireadpaper · 顶刊中的公共政策研究

溢价还是惩罚?

Premium or Penalty?
Journal of Human Resources · 2022 · Juan Saavedra、Darío Maldonado、Lucrecia Santibáñez、Luis Omar Herrera-Prada

中文摘要

各国教育预算主要用于支付教师薪酬。教师相对于其他职业究竟享有收入溢价还是承受收入惩罚,这一尚无定论的争议使教师薪酬决策复杂化。哥伦比亚的一项全国性筛选考试和行政数据表明,在任职初期,成绩高于及格分数线的教师候选人,其年收入高于成绩低于分数线的候选人。将断点回归方法从分数线附近扩展至更远范围后,结果显示,高分申请者同样享有颇具吸引力的收入溢价。尽管收入溢价可观,教师仍从事兼职工作,且教师职业并未吸引最优秀的大学毕业生,这凸显出仅靠教师薪酬来改善教育所面临的挑战。

Abstract

Countries spend education budgets primarily on teacher payroll. An unresolved debate on whether teachers earn a premium or a penalty relative to other occupations complicates teacher compensation decisions. A national screening exam in Colombia and administrative data show that teaching candidates scoring above the passing cutoff have greater annual earnings early in their tenure than those below the cutoff. Extension of regression discontinuity methods away from the cutoff indicate similarly attractive earnings premia for high-scoring applicants. Despite sizeable earnings premia, teachers hold outside jobs, and teaching does not attract top college graduates, underscoring challenges to improving education solely through teacher compensation.
在 ireadpaper 查看全部 →