← ireadpaper · 顶刊中的公共政策研究

通胀纾困是否得到传导?来自消费税的证据

Is inflation relief passed-through? Evidence from excise taxes
Journal of Public Economics · 2026 · Michael D. Noel、Travis Roach、Madison Hill

中文摘要

持续存在的疫情相关供应链问题与俄乌战争爆发共同导致2022年汽油价格急剧上涨,而同期总体通胀率也升至四十年来的最高水平。作为应对,五个州政府暂时停止征收汽油消费税,以向本州居民提供“通胀纾困”。本文在自然实验框架下采用多种方法,考察这一税收减免的税负归宿,并评估其是否全额传导给消费者。总体而言,我们发现消费税减免的传导并不完全,约82%的消费税减免传导给了消费者;但州层面的事件研究表明,其中两个州的传导可能是完全的。我们的结果意味着,汽油零售商意外获得了约3.9亿美元的补贴,而每位驾驶者仅节省约10至15美元。研究结果凸显了采取替代性政策措施的必要性。

Abstract

The combination of ongoing pandemic-related supply chain issues and the commencement of the Ukraine-Russia war triggered a sharp increase in gasoline prices in 2022, occurring alongside a forty-year high in general inflation. In response, five state governments temporarily stopped collecting excise taxes on gasoline in order to provide ‘inflation relief’ to their constituents. In this work, we examine the incidence of this tax relief and assess whether or not the full amount was passed-through to consumers using multiple methodologies in a natural experiment setting. In aggregate, we find that excise tax pass-through was not complete with about 82% of the excise tax relief passed down to consumers, though state-level event-studies show pass-through was likely complete in two states. Our results imply an unintended subsidy to gasoline retailers of approximately $390 million dollars in exchange for only about $10–15 in savings for each driver. The results highlight the need for alternative policy measures.
在 ireadpaper 查看全部 →