腐败与极端主义
Corruption and extremism
Journal of Development Economics · 2025 · [{"name": "Attila Gáspár", "affiliation": ["ELTE Centre for Economic and Regional Studies"]}, {"name": "Tommaso Giommoni", "affiliation": ["Tinbergen Institute", "University of Amsterdam"]}, {"name": "Massimo Morelli", "affiliation": ["Luxembourg Institute of Socio-Economic Research", "Bocconi University"]}, {"name": "Antonio Nicolò", "affiliation": ["University of Padua", "University of Manchester"]}]
中文摘要
本文表明,腐败会催生极端主义,但主要体现在反对派一方。尽管腐败损害所有公民的利益,但只有当少数派选民认为政治体系更加腐败时,他们才可能希望转向立场更极端的代表。在我们的模型中,反对派政治人物围绕在任者的腐败丑闻展开竞选,会提高其获胜概率,但同时也会降低预期的未来在职租金。由于极端主义政治人物在面对温和派对手时通常更不容易获胜,他们因而有更强的激励表明反腐立场。鉴于政治少数派一方的代表当选公职的概率较低,他们投票支持极端主义者所面临的机会成本也更小。我们的主要结果是,少数派更可能以更极端的方式应对腐败。我们利用印度尼西亚和巴西的数据,为这一新颖的非对称预测提供了因果证据。
Abstract
This paper shows that corruption generates extremism, but mainly on the opposition side. While corruption hurts all citizens, only voters on the minority side may desire to switch to a more extreme representative when they perceive a more corrupt political system. In our model, campaigning on a corruption scandal against the incumbent gives a higher winning probability for the opposition politician but simultaneously reduces expected future rents from office. As extremist politicians normally are less likely to win against a moderate opponent, they have a stronger incentive to take a stand against corruption. Given that the side of the political minority has a lower chance of having their representative elected to office, they face a smaller opportunity cost of voting for extremists. Our main result is that minorities are more likely to react to corruption with more extremism. We provide causal evidence for this novel asymmetric prediction from Indonesia and Brazil.
在 ireadpaper 查看全部 →