价格平价约束下的平台费用监管
Regulating Platform Fees under Price Parity
Journal of the European Economic Association · 2024 · [{"name": "Renato Gomes", "affiliation": ["Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique", "Toulouse School of Economics"]}, {"name": "Andrea Mantovani", "affiliation": ["TBS Education", "Toronto Baptist Seminary and Bible College"]}]
中文摘要
在线中介极大地扩展了消费者可获得的信息,但也通过收取高额佣金提高了卖方的边际成本。为防止去中介化,一些平台采用了价格平价条款和反引导条款,限制卖方使用其他销售渠道的能力。究竟应当维持、改革还是禁止这些条款,一直是政策争论的核心,但迄今尚未形成共识。作为一种替代方案,本文研究了如何对平台佣金设定上限。功利主义意义上的上限体现了庇古原则,即平台收取的净费用不应超过其对其他市场参与者产生的信息外部性。
Abstract
Abstract Online intermediaries greatly expand consumer information, but also raise sellers’ marginal costs by charging high commissions. To prevent disintermediation, some platforms adopted price parity and anti-steering provisions, which restrict sellers’ ability to use alternative sales channels. Whether to uphold, reform, or ban these provisions has been at the center of the policy debate, but, so far, little consensus has emerged. As an alternative, this paper studies how to cap platforms’ commissions. The utilitarian cap reflects the Pigouvian precept according to which the platform should charge net fees no greater than the informational externality it exerts on other market participants.
在 ireadpaper 查看全部 →