NBER Working Papers · 2026 · Anparasan Mahalingam、Matthew J. Higgins
中文摘要
关于战略要素市场的研究大多将交换条件视为价格。我们认为,许多战略性交易实际上是通过合同束来分配价值,其中支付条款与控制权相互依存。在大学技术许可情境中,我们提出“权利交易”理论:或有支付、未来改进权主张与商业化范围,作为合同束中相互关联的组成部分,共同决定剩余价值如何分配。基于858份手工编码的大学—产业许可合同,我们发现,更依赖特许权使用费和里程碑条款的合同,会赋予被许可方更强的未来改进权主张和更广泛的商业化范围。该结果在控制相关变量和固定效应后依然成立,且在方向上与作为补充的工具变量、事件研究和选择边界分析结果一致。我们进一步发现,当大学技术转移办公室拥有更丰富的合同缔结经验时,这一关系更强,表明合同缔结能力会影响战略要素市场中的价值攫取。更广泛地说,本研究表明,战略要素市场中的价值攫取不仅取决于组织为战略资源支付了什么,还取决于合同如何分配对这些资源未来开发和商业化的控制权。
Abstract
Research on strategic factor markets has largely treated the terms of exchange as price. We argue that many strategic transactions instead divide value through contractual bundles in which payment terms and control rights are interdependent. In university technology licensing, we theorize Rights Trading: contingent payment, future improvement claims, and commercialization scope operate as linked components of the contractual bundle through which surplus is allocated. Using 858 hand coded university–industry licenses, we find that contracts relying more heavily on royalty and milestone provisions grant licensees stronger future improvement claims and broader commercialization scope. The results persist across controls and fixed effects and are directionally consistent with complementary instrumental-variable, event-study, and selection-bound analyses. We further show that this relationship is stronger when university technology transfer offices have greater contracting experience, suggesting that contracting capability shapes value appropriation in strategic factor markets. More broadly, the study shows that value appropriation in strategic factor markets depends not only on what organizations pay for strategic resources, but also on how contracts allocate control over their future development and commercialization.