← ireadpaper · 顶刊中的公共政策研究

市场进入能否遏制合谋?来自仿制处方药卡特尔的证据

Does Entry Remedy Collusion? Evidence from the Generic Prescription Drug Cartel
American Economic Review · 2025 · Amanda Starc、Thomas Wollmann

中文摘要

市场进入对卡特尔构成根本性威胁。我们研究美国历史上规模最大的价格操纵案件中市场进入行为的程度及其影响,该案件涉及仿制药生产。我们将有关卡特尔内部运作的信息与监管申报材料和市场数据相匹配。卡特尔形成后,市场进入大幅增加,但监管审批使大多数进入者延迟了两至四年。我们估计了一个结构模型,并模拟了反事实均衡。若无市场进入,卡特尔利润将大幅提高。相应地,仅将监管延迟缩短一至两年,就相当于为消费者带来6.12亿至15亿美元的补偿变差。(JEL L12、L13、L25、L51、L65、M31、O34)

Abstract

Entry represents a fundamental threat to cartels. We study the extent and effect of this behavior in the largest price-fixing case in US history, which involves generic drug manufacturing. We link information on the cartel’s internal operations to regulatory filings and market data. There is a substantial increase in entry after cartel formation, but regulatory approvals delay most entrants by two to four years. We estimate a structural model and simulate counterfactual equilibria. Absent entry, cartel profits would be dramatically higher. Correspondingly, reducing regulatory delays by just 1–2 years equates to consumer compensating variation of $612 million–$1.5 billion. (JEL L12, L13, L25, L51, L65, M31, O34)
在 ireadpaper 查看全部 →