← ireadpaper · 顶刊中的公共政策研究

美国城市中的驱逐与贫困

Eviction and Poverty in American Cities
Quarterly Journal of Economics · 2023 · Robert Collinson、John Eric Humphries、Nicholas Mader、Davin Reed、Daniel Tannenbaum、Winnie van Dijk

中文摘要

美国每年有超过200万户家庭遭到驱逐诉讼。联邦、州和地方各级政策制定者日益推行旨在减少驱逐数量的政策,理由是驱逐会损害租户利益,并导致与无家可归相关的高额公共支出。我们利用来自两个主要都市地区——库克县(包括芝加哥)和纽约市——新近关联的行政数据,研究驱逐对租户的影响。我们记录到,在住房法院审理之前,租户已经历收入和就业下降,以及财务困境和就医次数增加。这些事前趋势给区分相关关系与因果关系带来了挑战。为解决这一问题,我们采用工具变量方法,以案件随机分配给宽严程度不同的法官为识别策略。我们发现,在最初两年内,驱逐令会增加无家可归和就医次数,并减少收入、耐用品消费和信贷可得性。住房和劳动力市场结果所受的影响主要由女性和黑人租户所驱动。从更长期来看,驱逐会增加负债并降低信用评分。

Abstract

More than two million U.S. households have an eviction case filed against them each year. Policy makers at the federal, state, and local levels are increasingly pursuing policies to reduce the number of evictions, citing harm to tenants and high public expenditures related to homelessness. We study the consequences of eviction for tenants using newly linked administrative data from two major urban areas: Cook County (which includes Chicago) and New York City. We document that before housing court, tenants experience declines in earnings and employment and increases in financial distress and hospital visits. These pre trends pose a challenge for disentangling correlation and causation. To address this problem, we use an instrumental variables approach based on cases randomly assigned to judges of varying leniency. We find that an eviction order increases homelessness and hospital visits and reduces earnings, durable goods consumption, and access to credit in the first two years. Effects on housing and labor market outcomes are driven by effects for female and Black tenants. In the longer run, eviction increases indebtedness and reduces credit scores.
在 ireadpaper 查看全部 →