中文摘要
我们考察气候变化对非洲季节性迁徙的牲畜放牧人群——即转场游牧民——的影响。传统上,转场游牧民与定居农耕民之间存在合作关系,即耕地在雨季用于作物种植、在旱季用于牲畜放牧。降雨稀缺可能扰乱这一安排,促使游牧群体在收获前迁移至农业用地,从而引发冲突。我们通过将关于转场游牧民和定居农耕民传统居住地的民族志信息,与1989年至2018年非洲降雨及暴力冲突事件的地点和时间的高分辨率数据相结合,来检验这一假说。我们发现,转场游牧民所在地区降雨减少会导致邻近地区发生冲突。与所提出的机制一致,这些冲突集中在农业地区;它们发生在雨季而非旱季;并且源于降雨对植物生物量增长的影响。由于游牧民多为穆斯林而农耕民多为基督徒,这一机制解释了近几十年来观察到的宗教冲突快速上升中的相当大一部分。关于政策应对,我们发现发展援助项目往往不能减轻我们所记录的影响。相比之下,当转场游牧民在国家政府中拥有更大权力时,这些影响会减弱,这表明更平等的政治代表性有利于和平。
Abstract
Abstract We consider the effects of climate change on seasonally migrant populations that herd livestock—i.e. transhumant pastoralists—in Africa. Traditionally, transhumant pastoralists benefit from a cooperative relationship with sedentary agriculturalists whereby arable land is used for crop farming in the wet season and animal grazing in the dry season. Rainfall scarcity can disrupt this arrangement by inducing pastoral groups to migrate to agricultural lands before the harvest, causing conflict to emerge. We examine this hypothesis by combining ethnographic information on the traditional locations of transhumant pastoralists and sedentary agriculturalists with high-resolution data on the location and timing of rainfall and violent conflict events in Africa from 1989 to 2018. We find that reduced rainfall in the territory of transhumant pastoralists leads to conflict in neighbouring areas. Consistent with the proposed mechanism, the conflicts are concentrated in agricultural areas; they occur during the wet season and not the dry season; and they are due to rainfall’s impact on plant biomass growth. Since pastoralists tend to be Muslim and agriculturalists Christian, this mechanism accounts for a sizable proportion of the rapid rise in religious conflict observed in recent decades. Regarding policy responses, we find that development aid projects tend not to mitigate the effects that we document. By contrast, the effects are reduced when transhumant pastoralists have greater power in national government, suggesting that more equal political representation is conducive to peace.