American Economic Journal: Economic Policy · 2021 · Santosh Anagol、Fernando Ferreira、Jonah Rexer
中文摘要
我们构建了一个框架,用以估算圣保罗市近期一项分区规划改革的经济价值,该改革改变了城市街区层面的最高许可建设规模。采用空间断点回归设计,我们发现,开发商对改革作出了反应:在允许密度更高的街区,多户住宅建设许可申请在短期内增加。中期来看,在获准提高开发密度的社区,我们观察到住房供给增加、房价下降。随后,我们利用一个允许住房管制内生决定的住房供需均衡模型来估算福利。我们发现,长期来看,该改革使住房存量增加1.9%,价格下降0.5%,且不同社区之间存在显著的异质性。价格下降带来的消费者福利收益较小,但在计入建成环境的变化后增至原来的4倍,其中大学受教育家庭和较高收入家庭获得的收益更多。然而,房东和现有房主面临的名义房价损失超过了全部消费者福利收益。
Abstract
We develop a framework to estimate the economic value of a recent zoning reform in the city of So Paulo, which altered maximum permitted construction at the city-block level. Using a spatial regression discontinuity design, we show that developers respond to the reform with short-run increases in filings for multi-family construction permits in blocks with higher allowable densities. In the medium-run we observe increases in housing availability and reductions in house prices in neighborhoods that were allowed more densification. Welfare is then estimated with an equilibrium model of housing demand and supply that allows for endogeneous housing regulation. We finding that, in the long-run, the reform produces a 1.9% increase in housing stock and a 0.5% reduction in prices, with substantial heterogeneity across neighborhoods. Consumer welfare gains due to price reductions are small, but increase 4-fold once accounting for changes in built environment, with more gains accruing to college educated and higher income families. However, nominal house price losses faced by landlords and existing homeowners overshadow all consumer welfare gains.