← ireadpaper · 顶刊中的公共政策研究

共同利益与选民极化

The Common Good and Voter Polarization
Journal of the European Economic Association · 2025 · Chad Kendall、John G. Matsusaka

中文摘要

选民是否完全从空间维度看待民主,将其视为冲突利益之间的权衡?抑或正如一些民主理论家长期以来所推测的那样,他们也将民主视为对“共同利益”的探寻?我们构建了一个模型,其中选民同时对共同利益收益和空间收益具有偏好,并提出了一种分离二者的新方法。利用1986—2020年加利福尼亚州公投提案数据估计该模型后,我们发现,74%的选民对共同利益赋予了显著权重,并且在此期间党派极化程度大致翻了一番,这主要是由民主党人向左偏移所致。

Abstract

Abstract Do voters see democracy entirely in spatial terms, as a tradeoff of conflicting interests, or do they also view it as a search for the “common good”, as some democracy theorists have long conjectured? We develop a model in which voters have preferences over both common-good and spatial payoffs, and provide a novel method to disentangle the two. Estimating the model on California ballot propositions from 1986 to 2020, we find that 74% of voters placed significant weight on the common good and that partisan polarization roughly doubled over the time period, mainly due to Democrats drifting left.
在 ireadpaper 查看全部 →