← ireadpaper · 顶刊中的公共政策研究

线性回归中的污染偏误

Contamination Bias in Linear Regressions
American Economic Review · 2024 · Paul Goldsmith-Pinkham、Peter Hull、Michal Kolesár

中文摘要

我们研究了包含多个处理和一组足以消除遗漏变量偏误的控制变量的回归。我们表明,这些回归通常无法估计异质性处理效应的凸平均值——相反,对每种处理效应的估计会被其他处理效应的非凸平均值所污染。我们讨论了三种可避免此类污染偏误的估计方法,包括以最易估计的加权平均效应为目标。对九项实证应用的重新分析发现,观察性研究中存在经济上和统计上均具有实质意义的污染偏误;由于倾向得分的变异性较小,实验研究中的污染偏误较为有限。

Abstract

We study regressions with multiple treatments and a set of controls that is flexible enough to purge omitted variable bias. We show these regressions generally fail to estimate convex averages of heterogeneous treatment effects—instead, estimates of each treatment’s effect are contaminated by nonconvex averages of the effects of other treatments. We discuss three estimation approaches that avoid such contamination bias, including the targeting of easiest-to-estimate weighted average effects. A reanalysis of nine empirical applications finds economically and statistically meaningful contamination bias in observational studies; contamination bias in experimental studies is more limited due to smaller variability in propensity scores. (JEL C21, C31, C51, H75, I21, I28)
在 ireadpaper 查看全部 →