Quarterly Journal of Economics · 2022 · Andrew Barr、Jonathan Eggleston、Alexander A. Smith
中文摘要
我们提供了新的证据,表明第一个孩子出生后的现金转移支付能够对该子女的结果产生巨大且持久的影响。我们利用美国子女相关税收优惠以1月1日出生日期为界的规定,这一规定导致其他方面相似的子女所在家庭在其出生后第一年获得的退税额存在显著差异。对于样本中平均的单子女低收入家庭,这一差额约为1,300美元,相当于收入的10%。利用特定年份全部的联邦税收行政数据,我们表明,婴儿期获得这笔转移支付使其成年早期的收入至少提高1%–2%,且对男性的影响更大。这些效应在较早年龄便已显现,具体表现为数学和阅读测试成绩提高,以及高中毕业概率上升。我们观察到的对父母短期结果的影响表明,在第一个孩子出生后的关键窗口期,额外的流动性会使家庭收入持续增加,这很可能促成了其对子女结果的下游影响。仅就对子女收入的长期效应而言,其规模已足以使这笔转移支付通过后续联邦所得税收入的增加实现自我偿付。
Abstract
Abstract We provide new evidence that cash transfers following the birth of a first child can have large and long-lasting effects on that child’s outcomes. We take advantage of the January 1 birthdate cutoff for U.S. child-related tax benefits, which results in families of otherwise similar children receiving substantially different refunds during the first year of life. For the average low-income single-child family in our sample, this difference amounts to roughly ${\$}$1,300, or 10% of income. Using the universe of administrative federal tax data in selected years, we show that this transfer in infancy increases young adult earnings by at least 1%–2%, with larger effects for males. These effects show up at earlier ages in terms of improved math and reading test scores and a higher likelihood of high-school graduation. The observed effects on shorter-run parental outcomes suggest that additional liquidity during the critical window following the birth of a first child leads to persistent increases in family income that likely contribute to the downstream effects on children’s outcomes. The longer-term effects on child earnings alone are large enough that the transfer pays for itself through subsequent increases in federal income tax revenue.