← ireadpaper · 顶刊中的公共政策研究

终究并非飞跃式开局?一则评论

Not a Flying Start after All? A Comment
Journal of Political Economy · 2024 · Otto Sevaldson Lillebø、Simen Markussen、Knut H. Røed、Yuejun Zhao

中文摘要

Carneiro、Løken和Salvanes(2015)在《政治经济学杂志》发表的一篇论文中报告称,一项被他们描述为在挪威引入带薪产假的改革对子女结果产生了较大的正向影响。其因果识别依赖于一个断点,即只有在某一特定截止日期之后生育的母亲才有资格享受带薪产假。我们表明,该分析所依据的改革描述并不正确。这项改革并未引入带薪产假,而是将其延长了5—6周。由于处理组和控制组面临相同的产假条件,所假定的断点从未存在。

Abstract

In a paper published in the Journal of Political Economy, Carneiro, Løken, and Salvanes (2015) reported large positive effects on offspring outcomes of a reform they described as introducing paid maternity leave in Norway. Causal identification rested on a discontinuity implying that only mothers giving birth after a specific cutoff date were entitled to paid leave. We show that the analysis relied on an incorrect description of the reform. The reform did not introduce paid maternity leave, but extended it by 5–6 weeks. The postulated discontinuity never existed as treatment and control groups had the same maternity leave conditions.
在 ireadpaper 查看全部 →