← ireadpaper · 顶刊中的公共政策研究

挤入还是挤出?企业研发补贴分配不连续性的证据

Crowding in or crowding out? Evidence from discontinuity in the assignment of business R&D subsidies
Journal of Public Economics · 2025 · Matěj Bajgar、Martin Srholec

中文摘要

我们采用断点回归设计,研究捷克共和国一项旗舰企业研发补贴计划对受资助企业的研发投资、专利申请和经济绩效的影响。研发补贴促进了中小企业的研发支出,但对大型企业并无此效应。在中小企业中,公共资金成功挤入了私人研发投资,1单位公共补贴与约2.3单位额外研发支出相关。对中小企业研发支出的正向影响在原项目结束后仍然持续,这可能得益于此后同一资助方提供的补贴。受资助中小企业的销售额在短期内也有所增长,但我们未观察到资助对专利申请、就业或长期销售额和生产率有任何正向影响。我们发现证据表明,补贴挤出了大型企业的私人研发支出,融资约束在解释这种效应异质性方面发挥了重要作用。

Abstract

We employ a regression discontinuity design to study the effects of a flagship business R&D subsidy programme in the Czech Republic on R&D investment, patenting and economic performance of the supported firms. The R&D subsidies stimulated R&D expenditure in small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) but not in large firms. In SMEs, public funding succeeded in crowding in private R&D investment, and 1 unit of public subsidy was associated with about 2.3 units of additional R&D expenditure. The positive effects on R&D expenditure of SMEs were sustained after the original projects ended, possibly thanks to subsequent subsidies from the same funding provider. Supported SMEs also saw their sales increase in the short term, but we do not observe any positive effects of the support on patenting, employment or longer-term sales and productivity. We find evidence that the subsidies crowded out private R&D expenditure in large firms and financing constraints played an important role in explaining the effect heterogeneity.
在 ireadpaper 查看全部 →